Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of Proposition 194


Proponents of Proposition 194 imply that prisoners who work on forest fire suppression crews, in cafeterias, or in the laundry do not pay for and receive unemployment insurance. Because such work is of great value, it is not only fair, but in the interest of all Californians that those prisoners are now minimally compensated during an employment change resulting from a justifiable change in residence, just as other workers are.

Prison gives inmates important work experience and exposure to the fringe benefits of working. Unemployment insurance has been part of the fringe benefit package for prisoners for years. What the proponents of 194 really want is an exception from the general rule for the benefit of companies taking advantage of the Joint Venture prison labor program.

Consider the benefits Joint Venture Program (JVP) companies already receive for work done by prisoners:

RENT--The rent JVP employers pay is below the market rate, often DRASTICALLY LOWER.

TAXES--JVP employers receive a 10% tax CREDIT, far more valuable than a mere deduction.

BENEFITS--JVP employers do not have to pay for health and dental benefits for prisoners. Instead, taxpayers like us pay for these benefits.

As you can see, JVP employers get substantial advantages. Rather than being content with the benefits that taxpayers already have given them, they are asking for an exemption from rules all other employers adhere to. Thankfully, by voting NO ON PROPOSITION 194 we can prevent damage to this successful program.

STEPHEN C. BIRDLEBOUGH
Member, Friends Committee on Legislation



The Internet supports communication, collaboration, information, and commerce. Digital supports the Internet.
Copyright 1996 Digital Equipment Corporation