Proposition 25 | Vote 2000 Home | Next - Prop 26 | Secretary of State Home |
Election Campaigns. Contributions and
Spending Limits. Public Financing. Disclosures.
Initiative Statute.
Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of Proposition 25
 

Arguments on this page are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency.


Some questions proponents are hoping you don't ask . . . "The contribution limits would be the highest in the nation . . . Worst of all, there is a huge \'soft money' loophole." --California Common Cause Newsletter, Spring 1999

"The measure would allow unlimited contributions to the state parties." --California Common Cause Press Release, March 25, 1999 While the League of Women Voters supports public financing for candidates, they oppose Prop. 25's taxpayer financing of initiative campaigns. More importantly, they want fair and equitable reform that levels the playing field and Prop. 25 does the opposite. It lets special interests flood our system with unlimited money and influence. Taxpayer and consumer organizations, seniors, campaign reform experts, business, labor, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Taxpayers for Fair Elections and everyday Californians who want a fair and level playing field. Because it uses public funds to pay for political advertising. Californians would become the first state taxpayers forced to subsidize the cost of initiative campaign advertising. It gives wealthy candidates an even greater advantage. It contains an UNFAIR LOOPHOLE that lets special interests circumvent contribution limits. It could force a $55+ MILLION ANNUAL TAX INCREASE on Californians. VOTE NO!
LARRY McCARTHY
President, California Taxpayers' Association

WAYNE JOHNSON
President, California Teachers Association

ALLAN ZAREMBERG
President, California Chamber of Commerce
Proposition 25 | Vote 2000 Home | Next - Prop 26 | Secretary of State Home |