Vote America  Secretary of State Home  Elections Home  Feedback  Find Your Polling Place
 California Official Voter Information Guide  Primary Election Date - Tuesday March 5, 2002
 Propositions Candidates Political Parties Voter Information Home
Link to California Secretary of State Website
PROP
48
 Court Consolidation.
Legislative Constitutional Amendment.
   PROP 46
   PROP 47
   PROP 48
   Official Title and Summary
   Analysis
   Arguments and Rebuttals
   Text of Proposed Law
   PROP 49
   PROP 50
   PROP 51
   PROP 52
 Put on the Ballot by the Legislature

Summary
Amends Constitution to delete references to the municipal courts, which references are now obsolete due to the consolidation of superior and municipal trial courts into unified superior courts. Fiscal Impact: No additional cost to state or local government.


What Your Vote Means

Yes

A YES vote on this measure means: The California Constitution would be amended to remove obsolete references to the municipal courts, and to make conforming changes relating to the membership of the California Judicial Council and the membership of the Commission on Judicial Performance.
No

A NO vote on this measure means: The California Constitution would not be amended to remove obsolete references to the municipal courts, and would not be amended to make conforming changes to the membership of the California Judicial Council and the membership of the Commission on Judicial Performance.


Arguments

Pro

Four years ago the voters authorized the elimination of municipal courts. Municipal courts no longer exist. Their function has been merged into the superior court, for an estimated annual savings of $23,000,000. Proposition 48 cleans up the California Constitution by eliminating obsolete references to the former municipal courts.
Con

Proposition 48 would unwisely prohibit the re-establishment of "municipal courts" in any of California’s 58 counties. The elimination of municipal courts in favor of a single "superior court" in each county has created at least the appearance of unfairness and has made local courts more insular and less accountable.


For Additional Information

For

Nathaniel Sterling
California Law Revision Commission
4000 Middlefield Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
650-494-1335
sterling@clrc.ca.gov
www.clrc.ca.gov
Against

Gary B. Wesley
Voter Information Alliance (VIA)
P.O. Box 90151
San Jose, CA 95109
408-882-5070
www.VoterInformationAlliance.org
Copyright © 2002 California Secretary of State