Voter Information Guide (VIG)




PDF versions of the VIG Get Adobe Reader


      Printer-Friendly Version (PDF ~50 KB)
Blue Star  
Title and Summary Analysis Arguments and Rebuttals Text of Proposed Law

PROP
3

 CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOND ACT. GRANT PROGRAM.
INITIATIVE STATUTE.
ANALYSIS BY THE LEGISLATIVE ANALYST             

BACKGROUND

Children's hospitals focus their efforts on the health care needs of children by providing diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative services to injured, disabled, and sick infants and children. Many children receiving services in these hospitals are from low-income families and have significant health care needs.

Proposition 61, which voters approved at the November 2004 statewide general election, authorized the sale of $750 million in general obligation bonds to provide funding for children's hospitals. The eligibility criteria for hospitals to receive funds under Proposition 61 is the same under this measure. As of June 1, 2008, about $403 million of the funds from Proposition 61 had been awarded to eligible hospitals.

PROPOSAL

This measure authorizes the state to sell $980 million in general obligation bonds for capital improvement projects at children's hospitals. The measure specifically identifies the five University of California children's hospitals as eligible bond fund recipients. There are additional children's hospitals that are likely to meet other eligibility criteria specified in the measure, which are based on hospitals'

Children’s Hospitals Eligible for Bond Funds Specifically Identified as Eligible—20 Percent of Total Funds Mattel Children’s Hospital at University of California, Los Angeles University Children’s Hospital at University of California, Irvine University of California, Davis Children’s Hospital University of California, San Diego Children’s Hospital University of California, San Francisco Children’s Hospital Likely to Be Eligible Hospitals—80 Percent of Total Funds Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego (formerly Children’s Hospital and Health Center, San Diego) Children’s Hospital Los Angeles Children’s Hospital and Research Center at Oakland Children’s Hospital of Orange County Loma Linda University Children’s Hospital Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford Miller’s Children’s Hospital, Long Beach Children’s Hospital Central California

performance in the 2001–02 fiscal year. These criteria include providing at least 160 licensed beds for infants and children. Figure 1 lists these children's hospitals.

For more information regarding general obligation bonds, please refer to the section of this ballot pamphlet entitled "An Overview of State Bond Debt."

The money raised from the bond sales could be used for the construction, expansion, remodeling, renovation, furnishing, equipping, financing, or refinancing of children's hospitals in the state. Eighty percent of the monies would be available to nonprofit children's hospitals and the remaining 20 percent would be available to University of California children's hospitals. The monies provided could not exceed the total cost of a project, and funded projects would have to be completed "within a reasonable period of time."

Children's hospitals would have to apply in writing for funds. The California Health Facilities Financing Authority (CHFFA), an existing state agency, would be required to develop the grant application. It must process submitted applications and award grants within 60 days. The CHFFA's decision to award a grant would be based on several factors, including whether the grant would contribute toward the expansion or improvement of health care access for children who are eligible for governmental health insurance programs, or who are indigent, underserved, or uninsured; whether the grant would contribute toward the improvement of child health care or pediatric patient outcomes; and whether the applicant hospital would promote pediatric teaching or research programs.

FISCAL EFFECTS

The cost of these bonds to the state would depend on the interest rates obtained when they were sold and the time period over which this debt would be repaid. If the $980 million in bonds authorized by this measure were sold at an interest rate of 5 percent and repaid over 30 years, the cost to the state General Fund would be about $2 billion to pay off both the principal ($980 million) and the interest ($933 million). The average payment for principal and interest would be about $64 million per year. Administrative costs would be limited to CHFFA's actual costs or 1 percent of the bond funds, whichever is less. We estimate these costs will be minor.


Back to the top