The rent is too damn high! Voting YES on Proposition 10 will free our local communities to decide what rent control protections are needed, if any, to tackle the housing crisis. Prop. TEN protects TENants.
Too many families spend over half their income on housing. That's simply unacceptable. Living paycheck to paycheck means it's difficult for these families to make ends meet, much less save for an emergency. Seniors on fixed-incomes have less to spend on food and medicine. Many of the people who should be the foundation of our local communities—the teachers, nurses and firefighters— are forced to move far away from the communities they serve because corporate landlords are doubling or even tripling the rent. With so many families struggling, many are driven to move away from California altogether, leaving jobs, relatives and schools behind. Even worse, many are forced into homelessness and living on the streets. With every 5% rent increase, 2,000 more people are forced out of their homes—a devastating blow to them and an even worse homeless problem for California to cope with.
Voting YES on Prop. 10 will allow cities that need it to pass laws limiting rent increases. Prop. 10 does NOT mandate rent control. It does NOT force any community to adopt any rent control measures that would not be a good fit for their own housing situation. It does NOT force any one-size-fits-all solutions on any city. Instead, Prop. 10 simply allows communities that are struggling with skyrocketing housing costs to put an annual limit on how much rents can be raised. Communities are free to bring more fairness to housing, ensuring that tenants have protections against huge rent increases, while ensuring that landlords receive a fair rate of return with reasonable yearly increases.
Voters have heard a lot of confusing arguments about Proposition 10. Don't believe the attacks. Wall Street corporations like the Donald Trump-linked Blackstone have spent millions of dollars to fight this measure because they are terrified this will cut into the huge profits they make from the thousands of foreclosed homes they buy. They don't care that California families are being crushed by high rent. It's time to take a stand FOR affordable housing and against greedy Wall Street billionaires and corporate landlords by voting YES on Prop. 10.
Prop. 10 is a limited measure that answers one question: who decides housing policy—local communities or Sacramento special interests and powerful real estate investors? It doesn't establish new housing policies, it just lets local communities—which are closer to the people—decide what works best for them. It's time we had the power to tackle the problems of homelessness and skyrocketing rent within our own communities.
California nurses, teachers, seniors, organized labor, including SEIU State Council, housing advocates, civil rights groups, clergy and faith-based groups and other organizations you trust all urge YES on Proposition 10. Remember, Prop. TEN protects TENants.
Get the facts about Proposition 10: www.VoteYesOnProp10.org
ZENEI CORTEZ, Co-President
California Nurses Association
NAN BRASMER, President
California Alliance for Retired Americans
ELENA POPP, Executive Director
Eviction Defense Network
PROP. 10 WILL MAKE THE HOUSING CRISIS WORSE, NOT BETTER
The sponsors of Prop. 10 want you to believe it will “magically” solve our housing crisis, but it’s badly flawed and will just make the housing crisis worse. Prop. 10:
AFFORDABLE HOUSING LEADERS AGREE: NO ON PROP. 10
“Prop. 10 prevents any future statewide housing solutions and handcuffs the legislature and governor from adopting tenant protections.”—Alice Huffman, President, California State Conference NAACP
“Prop. 10 does nothing to build new affordable housing that families desperately need.”—John Gamboa, CoFounder, The Two Hundred—a coalition of 200+ social justice leaders
“Under Prop. 10, families searching for affordable housing will find themselves with even fewer choices and more expensive housing options.”—Robert Apodaca, Executive Director, United Latinos Vote
“For seniors on Social Security and fixed incomes, Prop. 10 could be devastating.”—Marilyn H. Markham, Board Member, California Senior Advocates League
“Prop. 10 allows bureaucrats to tell homeowners what they can and cannot do with their own homes.”—Stephen White, President, California Association of REALTORS
“Prop. 10 would allow unelected bureaucrats to impose fees on all housing, including single-family homes, with no vote of the people or local elected body.”—Jon Coupal, President, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
Join independents, Democrats, Republicans, renters and homeowners, seniors, taxpayers, and minority groups in voting NO on Prop. 10!
ALICE A. HUFFMAN, President
California State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
BETTY JO TOCCOLI, President
California Small Business Association
MARILYN H. MARKHAM, Board Member
California Senior Advocates League
PROP. 10 IS BADLY FLAWED AND WILL MAKE OUR HOUSING CRISIS WORSE. VOTE NO.
• PROP. 10: BAD FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE HOMEOWNERS
“Prop. 10 could hurt homeowners by authorizing a new government bureaucracy that can tell homeowners what they can and cannot do with their own private residence. It could make homes more expensive for future buyers and hurt families trying to purchase their first home.”— Stephen White, President, California Association of REALTORS
• PROP. 10: BAD FOR RENTERS
“Tens of thousands of renters, INCLUDING SENIORS AND OTHERS ON FIXED INCOMES, could be forced out of their apartments and communities under Prop. 10, which allows wealthy corporate landlords to turn apartments into condos and short-term vacation rentals. It will increase the cost of renting and make it even harder to find affordable housing.”—Alice Huffman, President, California State Conference NAACP
NO ON 10—TOO MANY FLAWS:
• ALLOWS REGULATION OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES Prop. 10 repeals protections homeowners have enjoyed for over 20 years, and lets the government dictate pricing for privately owned single-family homes, controlling how much homeowners can charge to rent out their home—or even just a room. Prop. 10 might even lead to bureaucrats charging homeowners a fee for taking their home off the rental market.
• PUTS BUREAUCRATS IN CHARGE OF HOUSING Prop. 10 puts as many as 539 rental boards in charge of housing, giving government agencies unlimited power to add fees on housing, ultimately increasing rents and making homes and apartments more expensive. These boards may have unlimited power to set their salaries and benefits, while adding fees to housing that will be passed on to tenants in the form of higher rents.
• PUTS TAXPAYERS AT RISK FOR MILLIONS IN LEGAL COSTS
If homeowners, tenants or voters challenge the law in court, Prop. 10 requires California taxpayers to pay the sponsors’ legal bills. Taxpayers could be stuck paying millions of dollars for a poorly drafted and flawed measure.
• ADDS TENS OF MILLIONS IN NEW COSTS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
The state’s non-partisan Legislative Analyst says Prop. 10 could increase costs for local governments by tens of millions of dollars per year and cost the state millions more in lost revenue. This could result in less money for schools and emergency services, reduced new home construction, and a loss of thousands of well-paid construction jobs.
• DRIVES UP THE COST OF EXISTING HOUSING
New government fees and regulations will give homeowners a huge financial incentive to convert rental properties into more profitable uses like short-term vacation rentals, increasing the cost of existing housing and making it even harder for renters to find affordable housing in the future.
BOTTOM LINE: PROP. 10 HAS TOO MANY FLAWS AND WILL MAKE THE HOUSING CRISIS WORSE.
Learn why voters from every political persuasion and corner of California are voting NO on Prop. 10 at www.ReadItForYourself.com
American G.I. Forum of California, California Senior Advocates League, California State Conference NAACP, California Association of REALTORS, Family Business Association of California, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, California Chamber of Commerce, California Business Roundtable, United Latinos Vote
ALICE A. HUFFMAN, President
California State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
FREDERICK A. ROMERO, State Commander
American G.I. Forum of California
STEPHEN WHITE, President
California Association of REALTORS
Don’t be fooled by the corporate special interests opposing Proposition 10. If they wanted to help renters afford housing, a basic human need, California wouldn’t be in this housing crisis. Follow the money: Wealthy real estate interests, corporate landlords and Wall Street investors have profited from the current system for decades. These big corporations shamelessly double or even triple rent because they can get away with it. They make HUGE PROFITS from the housing crisis they helped create. No wonder they don’t want to fix it!
Who Supports Prop. 10? Nonprofit organizations, teachers, nurses, retirees, labor, faith-based groups, housing advocates, and California Democratic Party all urge YES because Prop. TEN protects Tenants.
Tenants and homeowners should vote YES to keep communities strong. It enables working people—teachers, firefighters, long-term care workers, grocery clerks—to live in communities they serve, while still affording basic needs like food and childcare. Greedy corporate landlords are forcing too many disabled and seniors on fixedincomes to choose between rent or medicine, and they’re forcing more low-income families into homelessness—a growing, costly crisis.
Prop. 10 doesn’t mandate new laws or bureaucracies for any community—it just gives YOU, the people, the power to develop rent control policies for YOUR community. People win, not the greedy special interests. The rent is too damn high! YES on TEN to protect Tenants.
SUPPORTED BY CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY; California Nurses Association; Housing California; National Urban League; ACLU of California; AIDS Healthcare Foundation; Property Owners for Fair and Affordable Housing; Painters & Allied Trades 36; Service Employees International Union (SEIU); American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME); Humboldt and Del Norte Counties Central Labor Council AFL-CIO; California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation; Western Center on Law and Poverty; National Action Network-Los Angeles; Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy; and tenant organizations throughout the state.
ERIC C. HEINS, President
California Teachers Association
REV. WILLIAM D. SMART, JR., President,
Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Southern California
ROXANNE SANCHEZ, President
SEIU California
Arguments printed on this page are the opinions of the authors, and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency.