BACKGROUND
California spends about $20 billion a year from
a combination of state, federal, and local funds to
maintain, operate, and improve its highways, streets
and roads, passenger rail, and transit systems. These
expenditures are primarily funded on a pay-as-you-go
basis from taxes and user fees.
There are two primary state tax sources that fund
state transportation programs. First, the state's 18
cent per gallon excise tax on gasoline and diesel fuel
(generally referred to as the gas tax) generates about
$3.4 billion annually. Second, revenues from the
state sales tax on gasoline and diesel fuel currently
provide about $2 billion a year. Additionally, the
state imposes weight fees on commercial vehicles (trucks), which generate roughly $900 million
a year. Generally, these revenues must be used
for specific transportation purposes, including
improvements to highways, streets and roads,
passenger rail, and transit systems. These funds
may also be used to mitigate the environmental
impacts of various transportation projects. Under
specified conditions, these revenues may be loaned
or used for nontransportation uses.
Since 1990, voters have approved roughly
$5 billion in state general obligation bonds to fund
transportation. These bond proceeds have been
dedicated primarily to passenger rail and transit
improvements, as well as to retrofit highways and
bridges for earthquake safety. As of June 2006, all
but about $355 million of the authorized bonds
have been spent on projects.
In addition to state funds, California’s
transportation system receives federal and local
money. The state receives about $4.5 billion
a year in federal gasoline and diesel fuel tax
revenues for various transportation purposes.
Collectively, local governments invest roughly
$9.5 billion annually into California’s highways,
streets and roads, passenger rail, and transit
systems. This funding comes mainly from a
mix of local sales and property taxes, as well as
transit fares. Local governments have also issued
bonds backed mainly by local sales tax revenues
to fund transportation projects.
PROPOSAL
This measure authorizes the state to sell about
$20 billion of general obligation bonds to fund
transportation projects to relieve congestion,
improve the movement of goods, improve air
quality, and enhance the safety and security of the
transportation system. (See “An Overview of State
Bond Debt” on page 96 for basic information on
state general obligation bonds.)
Figure 1 summarizes the purposes
for which the bond money would be used. The
bond money would be available for expenditure
by various state agencies and for grants to local
agencies and transit operators upon appropriation
by the Legislature:
- Congestion Reduction, Highway and Local Road Improvements—$11.3 billion—for capital
improvements to reduce congestion and increase capacity on state highways, local roads, and
public transit for grants available to locally funded transportation projects, as well as for projects to
rehabilitate state highways and local roads.
- Public Transportation—$4 billion—to make capital improvements to local transit services
and the state’s intercity rail service. These improvements would include purchasing
buses and railcars, as well as making safety enhancements to existing transit facilities.
- Goods Movement and Air Quality—$3.2 billion—for projects to improve the movement of
goods—through the ports, on the state highway and rail systems, and between California and
Mexico—and for projects to improve air quality by reducing emissions related to goods movement
and replacing or retrofitting school buses.
- Safety and Security—$1.5 billion—for projects to increase protection against a security threat or
improve disaster response capabilities on transit systems; as well as for grants to improve the
safety of rail crossings to seismically retrofit local bridges, ramps, and overpasses; and to improve
security and disaster planning in publicly owned ports, harbors, and ferry terminals.
FIGURE 1 |
|
Proposition 1B: Uses of Bond Funds |
|
|
Amount
(In Millions)
|
Congestion Reduction, Highway and Local Road Improvements |
$11,250 |
Reduce congestion on state highways and major access routes
|
$4,500
|
Increase highways, roads, and transit capacity
|
2,000
|
Improve local roads
|
2,000
|
Enhance State Route 99 capacity, safety, and operations
|
1,000
|
Provide grants for locally funded transportation projects
|
1,000
|
Rehabilitate and improve operation of state highways and local roads
|
750
|
Public Transportation |
$4,000 |
Improve local rail and transit services, including purchasing vehicles and right of way
|
$3,600
|
Improve intercity rail, including purchasing railcars and locomotives
|
400
|
Goods Movement and Air Quality |
$3,200 |
Improve movement of goods on state highways and rail system, and in ports
|
$2,000
|
Reduce emissions from goods movement activities
|
1,000
|
Retrofit and replace school buses
|
200
|
Safety and Security |
$1,475 |
Improve security and facilitate disaster response of transit systems
|
$1,000
|
Provide grants to improve railroad crossing safety
|
250
|
Provide grants to seismically retrofit local bridges and overpasses
|
125
|
Provide grants to improve security and disaster planning in publicly owned ports, harbors, and ferry facilities
|
100
|
Total |
$19,925 |
FISCAL EFFECTS
Bond Costs. The costs of these bonds would
depend on interest rates in effect at the time they
are sold and the time period over which they are
repaid. The state would likely make principal and interest payments from the state's General Fund
over a period of about 30 years. If the bonds
are sold at an average interest rate of 5 percent,
the cost would be about $38.9 billion to pay off
both the principal ($19.9 billion) and interest
($19.0 billion). The average repayment for
principal and interest would be about $1.3 billion
per year.
Operational Costs. The state and local governments that construct or improve transportation infrastructure with these bond funds (by, for example, building roads and bridges or purchasing buses or railcars) will incur unknown additional costs to operate and maintain them. A portion of these costs would be offset by revenues generated by the improvements, such as transit fares and tolls.
|